🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring similar bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a proposal increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," commented one MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government committed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are secure and fit for minors," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is mostly happening at the local level amid national stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures requiring adult authorization for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to copy this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

Even as this global discussion continues, the actions of Australia and its followers show that states globally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.